Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Yafan Wang vs Nao Hibino Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wang vs Hibino analysis and find out who is favored!
Yafan Wang vs Nao Hibino Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Wang 1 - 2 Hibino
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wang has won 46.47% of points on their second serve, while Hibino has won 45.35%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wang, in recent form, has won 51.46% of their opponent's second serve points, while Hibino has won 54.29%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.2% and 36.33% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wang has saved 58.9% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hibino has saved 54.04% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wang has won 67.27% of matches played (W/L 37/ 18), with Hibino winning 50.79% (W/L 32/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wang has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 88% (W/L 14/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 44/ 38). Hibino has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 15/ 11), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 45/ 55).
- Player level: In the last year, Wang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 24/ 8), where as Hibino has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 52.38% of matches (W/L 11/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Wang winning 1 times and Hibino being victorious 2 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Wang winning 2 and Hibino winning 5. The last match between Wang and Hibino was at the Liuzhou, 28-10-2017, Final, Hard with Yafan Wang getting the victory 3-6 6-4 3-3 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:22:39.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wang and Hibino have played a deciding set 1 times, with Wang winning 0 times and Hibino 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Wang winning 0, and Hibino 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wang has played against opponents with an average rank of 218.96 while Hibino has played against players with an average rank of 200.08.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wang has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hibino has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wang has converted 39.74% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hibino has converted 45.68% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
72
Rank
47
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total2
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass1
95
Rank
56
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
61% (343-217)
Career Total W/L
55% (370-299)
52% (13-12)
YTD W/L
48% (16-17)
$1,505,667
Career Prize Money
$1,225,315
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Yafan Wang | Nao Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 5 |
| Games Won | 27 | 42 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:22:39 | 0:22:39 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (31/56) | 75% (30/40) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 45% (14/31) | 70% (21/30) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 32% (8/25) | 60% (6/10) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 40% (6/15) |
| Return Points W% | 33% (13/40) | 61% (34/56) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-4 3-3 ret. | |||||
| 6-0 6-2 |
Stats 
Nao Hibino
Player
Yafan Wang
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
| 4-6 6-2 7-5 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Yafan Wang | Nao Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (13/12) | 48% (16/17) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (30/28) | 48% (39/43) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (266/270) | 50% (367/369) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 58% (11/8) | 55% (12/10) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 22% (2/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.25 | 0.14 |
| Aces Total | 65 | 52 |
| DFs per game | 0.3 | 0.27 |
| DFs Total | 79 | 97 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:1 | 1:45:30 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 181.8 | 175.12 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1095/1790) | 67% (1608/2415) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (689/1095) | 62% (998/1608) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (323/695) | 45% (366/807) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (91/229) | 46% (127/278) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (832/1897) | 43% (1044/2424) |
| Slam W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/3) | 62% (8/5) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 60% (6/4) | 20% (1/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 57% (4/3) | 45% (5/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (13/25) | 48% (16/33) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 57% (4/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (4/8) | 56% (9/16) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (12/10) | 73% (15/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (12/2) | 27% (15/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 23% (13/3) | 28% (18/5) |
Yafan Wang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Dayana Yastremska
Player
Yafan Wang
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yafan Wang
Player
Maria Timofeeva
50%
(
27 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktoriya Tomova
Player
Yafan Wang
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yafan Wang
Player
Lin Zhu
56%
(
49 of
87)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
89
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesika Maleckova
Player
Yafan Wang
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
88)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
44 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katie Volynets
Player
Yafan Wang
85%
(
63 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
86
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peyton Stearns
Player
Yafan Wang
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Diana Shnaider
Player
Yafan Wang
61%
(
74 of
122)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
87)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
46%
(
22 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
45%
(
55 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
106
Total Points Won
103
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yafan Wang
Player
Erika Andreeva
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
23 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yafan Wang
Player
Sara Errani
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
47 of
64)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Nao Hibino Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Nao Hibino
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Noma Akugue Noha
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
9 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
52
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Anna Bondar
58%
(
52 of
89)
1st Serve %
52%
(
45 of
86)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
65%
(
24 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernarda Pera
Player
Nao Hibino
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Nao Hibino
66%
(
61 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
64 of
100)
1
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
5
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
47%
(
44 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
50 of
100)
99
Total Points Won
94
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristina Mladenovic
Player
Nao Hibino
66%
(
77 of
117)
1st Serve %
57%
(
56 of
99)
0
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
9
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
41%
(
48 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
99)
116
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guiomar Zuleta De Reales
Player
Nao Hibino
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Nao Hibino
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
6
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Nao Hibino
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 3 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Yulia Putintseva
74%
(
77 of
104)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
99)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Wang Vs Hibino Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Wang are available here and Hibino photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Yafan Wang
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Nao Hibino
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
